Any other Legal Issue

LegalKart - Download the app for consumer App

Download LegalKart

  • Trusted
  • Affordable
  • Secure
Download Now!
"The Cost of Delay: Why Timely Legal Consultation is Critical"
Any other Legal Issue

"The Cost of Delay: Why Timely Legal Consultation is Critical"

In today's fast-paced world, time is of the essence, and delays can have significant consequences. This is especially true when it comes to legal matters, where timely action can often make all the difference between success and failure. Delaying legal consultation can lead to missed deadlines, lost opportunities, and even irreparable harm to your matter. The cost of delay can be high, both in terms of financial and emotional expenses. In this blog, we will explore why timely legal consultation is critical and how it can help you protect your rights and interests in a variety of legal situations.



Missed Opportunities

The saying "Time and tide wait for no man" reminds us that we can't control time and missed opportunities can happen if we don't act fast enough in legal matters. Seeking timely legal advice and taking prompt action can make a big difference in achieving a favorable outcome. For example, in a family matter, acting quickly without expert advice can lead to a legal battle that could have been resolved amicably. Once you've taken the wrong step, it may be too late to resolve the matter peacefully as the other party may retaliate. Don't let missed opportunities and unnecessary legal battles cost you time, money, and stress.

Increased Legal Costs

Delaying legal consultation can result in significant increases in legal costs. This is because legal problems can escalate quickly and become more complex over time, requiring more resources and expertise to resolve. For instance, a simple contract dispute that could have been resolved through negotiation in the early stages may end up going to court if left unaddressed for too long, resulting in significant legal fees and court costs. Additionally, delays in seeking legal advice can lead to missed deadlines and opportunities to take advantage of legal protections, which can result in additional legal costs or even losing the case altogether. Ultimately, seeking timely legal consultation can help prevent legal problems from snowballing into more complicated and expensive issues.


Damage to Reputation and Brand

Delaying legal consultation can also lead to significant damage to a company's reputation and brand. Negative publicity can spread quickly in the digital age, and legal issues can be particularly damaging if left unaddressed. For example, if a company is accused of wrongdoing or is involved in a legal dispute, negative media coverage can quickly erode consumer trust and loyalty, resulting in decreased sales and revenue. In addition, social media and online review platforms can amplify the damage to a company's reputation, making it more difficult to recover from negative publicity. Seeking timely legal consultation can help companies proactively manage their reputation and mitigate the risk of long-term brand damage.


Personal Stress and Strain

Delaying legal consultation can also cause personal stress and strain, which can have significant negative impacts on an individual's mental and emotional well-being. Legal problems can be overwhelming and can lead to feelings of anxiety, frustration, and uncertainty, which can affect both professional and personal life. Delaying legal consultation can prolong these feelings of stress and strain, causing individuals to feel stuck and helpless in their situation. Seeking timely legal consultation can help alleviate these negative emotions by providing individuals with a clear understanding of their legal rights and options for resolution. By taking a proactive approach to legal issues, individuals can regain a sense of control and reduce the personal stress and strain associated with legal problems.


Missed Deadlines

Many legal issues have deadlines that must be met to avoid legal consequences. Delaying legal action can lead to missed deadlines, resulting in negative legal and financial consequences. For example, if you delay seeking legal advice in a divorce case, you may miss important deadlines for filing documents or responding to court orders, which can result in a less favorable outcome.


Loss of Evidence

In many legal matters, evidence is critical to building a strong case. Delaying legal action can result in a loss of evidence, making it more challenging to build a strong case. For example, if you delay seeking legal advice after a car accident, the evidence at the scene may disappear, making it harder to prove fault.


Reduced Legal Options

Finally, delaying legal action can result in reduced legal options. For example, if you delay seeking legal advice in a contract dispute, you may lose the opportunity to negotiate a settlement or seek arbitration, leaving you with only the option of going to court.



As the famous author and entrepreneur, Jim Rohn once said, "If you don't design your own life plan, chances are you'll fall into someone else's plan. And guess what they have planned for you? Not much." This quote can be applied to the importance of seeking timely legal consultation. If you don't design your own legal plan, you'll fall into someone else's plan, whether that's an opposing party or a court decision. By seeking legal advice early on, you can take control of your legal situation and design your own plan for resolution, rather than being at the mercy of others. So don't wait, take charge of your legal situation, and design your own plan for a successful outcome.

Defamation law in India Explained
Any other Legal Issue

Defamation law in India Explained

An individual's reputation is damaged when untrue comments about them are spread, according to the dictionary definition of defamation. Defamation is the purposeful, intentional publication or utterance of a false and untrue remark with the intention of damaging another person's reputation. A person's reputation is considered his property, and any harm to it is illegal. It might be spoken or written. Libel refers to defamatory written or typed information or images, whereas slander refers to defamatory spoken language. Roman law and Dutch law both have a long tradition of addressing defamation. In Roman law, abusive chanting was punished by death. In ancient English and German law, the punishment for insults was to have the tongue chopped out. Only the imputing of criminal activity, social sickness, or casting doubt on one's professional capacity comprised slander in England at the ending of the 18th century. Allegations of unchastity became unlawful after the Slander of Women Act was passed. Defamation laws in France were fairly strict. Ostentatious retractions of libellous material from newspapers were harshly punished, and the only valid defence when the publication included public figures was the truth. In Italy, defamation is illegal and is rarely justified by the facts.



The Constitution's Article 19 guarantees its people a number of liberties. Nevertheless, the reasonable restriction to Article 19(1)(a) has been established by Article 19(2). Among the limitations include contempt of court, defamation, and instigation to commit a crime. In India, defamation is a civil offence that can result in damages awards and a criminal offence carrying a prison sentence. 

The criminal law on defamation is codified in the IPC, 1860, although defamation is punished as a civil offence per tort law. Section 499 provides a definition of defamation, and Section 500 provides details on the penalty. Any verbal, written, or visual comment for another individual intended to harm their reputation is considered a defamatory act. If something is spoken about a deceased person and would be considered defamatory if the person were still living, then the remark may be considered defamatory. The group of people must include businesses or organisations. Unless the allegedly defamatory statement reduces the speaker's moral or intellectual integrity and the esteem for his class or profession in the eyes of people, it is not a defamatory remark. The actions of anyone commenting on a public performance or discussing any public concern are examples of exceptions and any representation of truth necessary for the public's good. 

Libel is the primary use of defamation in civil law. The statement being publicised against the person harms his standing in society. The assertions must be untrue and made without the permission of the putative victim of defamation. The defendant may be held liable for financial damages for defamation. For a defamation lawsuit to succeed, there are specific prerequisites. A person may be prosecuted to compensate the injured party for damages if the conditions below are satisfied: 

  • It has to be a disparaging remark.  

  • The comment must be about the plaintiff. 

  • A published remark of this nature is required.

There have also been some very prominent judgements on defamation, and one of them is the Subramanian Swamy  Versus Union Of India. According to the Supreme Court’s judgement in this case, the right to free speech is "a highly prized principle under the Constitution." Applying the idea of reasonable limitations, it was determined that "the right to freedom of expression is not unlimited, despite the broad and inclusive scope of freedom of speech. It is susceptible to the imposing of justifiable limitations. According to the court, a person's reputation is a crucial component of their right to life as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. "One's reputation cannot be sacrificed on the shrine of another's right to free speech. The court declared its support for tolerance of critique, disagreement, and incongruence but declared that it had no room for libellous attack.


Everyone can benefit from having a good reputation. Such an asset can be lawfully repaired if it is damaged. Laws against defamation have been put in place to stop people from utilising their right to free speech and expression for malevolent purposes. To its credit, Indian law does not distinguish between libel and slander. Otherwise, there might have been opportunities to commit defamation and break the rule that nothing should be published in writing. A person cannot be defamed with the aim of harming them, and intentional acts of defamation are also punishable by jail. The right to free speech and expression is reasonably limited by defamation law, which is likewise constitutional. If the actions taken to fall under the listed exceptions, it is not defamation. There have been many defamation cases over the years, and the court has carefully examined each one of them. These cases now serve as standards.

Know about legal options for non-payment of dues by clients
Any other Legal Issue

Know about legal options for non-payment of dues by clients

Everyday transactions between buyers and sellers occur. In today's corporate world, there is a lot of competition, making managing buyer and seller relationships challenging. A better relationship may be quite advantageous for both the buyer and the seller. A seller's performance and a buyer's comprehension of one another might lead to mutual trust. The key to managing the connection is having open lines of communication from the outset between the buyer and vendor. The connection between the buyer and seller is likewise based on trust, but what happens if someone betrays that trust? Anybody may betray confidence, even after doing business with each other for years.

Also, read The Unique Identity Of A Company Director As Per The Company Law

Create a formal demand.

If you want to file a lawsuit over unpaid bills, you start the procedure by sending a formal demand letter to the defendant, who may be a person, a company, or both. You may make the demand against both the defendant (a company) and the personal guarantee (a person) signed by the defendant (a person).

Your demand letter should include, among other things:

• Determine the nature of the default by the client;

• Determine the amount owed;

• Request payment of all past-due sums by a certain deadline; and

• Inform of potential legal action.

• Inform of potential legal action.

Legal Action

You may take the following legal actions:

Remedies available under civil law:

  • Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code states that this power is given to the party who wants to recover his money. This decision permits a creditor to file a straightforward lawsuit. After the summons and lawsuit filing, this decision is considered a speedier trial. Only 10 days are given to the defendant to reply to the lawsuit. The court will take the plaintiff's charges as true if the defendant is absent. The plaintiff's case can be effectively defended by the defence by providing evidence and surviving the cross-examination. If the court finds that the defendant did not take the credit, the plaintiff will receive nothing; nevertheless, if the plaintiff can show that the defendant did accept the credit and did not repay it, the plaintiff will receive the awarded damages.
  • The Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881 regulates situations where checks, bills of exchange, and other forms of payment are not honoured. The act has many portions for various instruments. The dishonour of a check due to inadequacy, etc., of money in the account is addressed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the seller may sue the consumer if any client delays payment via check. A legal notification regarding the bounced check is delivered to the consumer under 138, and if he doesn't respond within 30 days, the seller may file a lawsuit against him under 138 of the NI Act for non-payment of the payment.

Also, read Know All About The Service Agreement.

Remedies under criminal law

  • According to the Indian Penal Code, criminal breach of trust is covered under Section 406: according to Indian Penal Code Section 406. Seller may bring a lawsuit for trust violation. By failing to pay for the goods or services received, the customer has betrayed the seller's confidence, the seller must demonstrate.
  • The cheating is covered under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code. Cheating between a vendor and a customer or between two persons can take many different forms. Cheaters will be penalised with either type of jail for a time up to a year, a fine, or a combination of the two.
  • The Indian Penal Code's Section 420: This section provides remedy to the victim of fraud. Similar to section 417, this section also addresses cheating. This clause may allow the seller to take legal action if the consumer fails to make a payment.

Initiating CIRP as an Operational Creditor

According to Section 5(20) of the Code, an operational creditor is any person or entity legally owed operational debt and anybody to whom it has been properly assigned or transferred. Financial liabilities connected to the sale of goods or services are classified as operational debt under Section 5(21) of the Code. Obligations due to the Central or State Governments, other authorities, or workers for unpaid salaries, as well as debts owed for the restoration of unpaid wages owed under any legislation, are also included. When a Corporate Debtor fails to pay debts, Operational Creditors may commence the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor. The sections and rules have clearly defined the complete procedure and requirement of filing a case before NCLT under the Code for speedy resolutions.

Download Legalkart app now

Get 5 mins of talk time Free !
LegalKart Apps

LegalKart- Your Legal Advisor App is for general users who need to avail services like consulting a Lawyer on phone, document drafting, getting property verified by lawyers.